|
|
Categories |
4 points |
3 points |
2 points |
1 point |
POINTS |
INTRODUCTION reader engagement explanation of topic |
Well-developed intro engages reader and creates interest.
Contains well-defined and thorough explanation of topic. |
Introduction creates interest but not well developed.
Contains an explanation of topic. |
Intro is generic, creating little interest.
Contains adequate explanation of topic but is vague. |
Intro is collection of random info not related to topic.
Explanation of topic is vague or unclear. |
|
TOPIC argument main points supporting examples |
Argument logical and thoughtful.
Well-developed points directly relate to topic.
Supporting examples are concrete and detailed. |
Argument present, adequate.
Main points relate to topic but don’t go beyond the obvious.
Supporting examples general and/or unspecific. |
Argument present but weak.
Some main points are present but missing obvious points.
Few supporting examples given are weak or irrelevant. |
Argument not present.
Few main points, poor development of ideas.
No supporting examples given. |
|
ORGANIZATION structure transitions |
Logical progression of ideas, clear structure that enhances topic.
Transitions are thoughtful and flow with essay. |
Logical progression of ideas but structure not always clear.
Transitions are present, but often weak or awkward. |
Structure is clear but at times is awkward and/or distracting.
Some weak/poor transitions are present. |
No discernible structure and/or organization.
No transitions are present. |
|
STYLE AND MECHANICS sentence flow and variety language and word choice |
Writing is smooth and skillful, with strong, varied sentences.
Language is direct and concise, and words chosen are clear and suitable. |
Writing is clear and sentences often have varied structure.
Language is sometimes overly wordy, and/or words chosen are fillers or artificial. |
Writing is clear overall, but sentences lack variety.
Language is often redundant or pompous, and/or words chosen are unsuitable. |
Writing is hard to follow with fragments or run-on sentences.
Language is chaotic and words chosen are inappropriate for college-level work. |
|
SPELLING AND GRAMMAR |
Spelling and grammar are correct. No errors. |
Spelling and grammar mainly correct, with few errors (1-3). |
Some errors in spelling and grammar (4-6). |
Distracting number of spelling and grammar errors. |
|
RUBRIC TOTAL |
|||||
LATE POINTS DEDUCTED (1 PER DAY LATE) |
|||||
TOTAL POINTS |
Remember that this is a 20-point assignment ... the detail and comprehensiveness of your response should reflect that additional weight.
Category |
4 - Exemplary |
3 - Proficient |
2 - Partially Proficient |
1 - Incomplete |
points |
FIELDWORK PARTICIPATION |
contributes a lot to tasks, encourages and supports others
consistently stays focused on task and what needs to be done
organized |
willing team member who tries hard
focuses on task and what needs to be done most of the time
somewhat organized |
a satisfactory team member, does what is required
focuses on task and what needs to be done some of the time, needs to be reminded to stay on task |
sometimes doesn't participate, may not complete tasks
rarely focuses on task and what needs to be done, seldom takes fieldwork seriously |
|
FIELDWORK DATA |
all tasks correctly completed
data correctly recorded in a legible and understandable manner |
all tasks correctly completed
data sometimes recorded incorrectly or illegibly |
some tasks correctly completed
data sometimes not recorded resulting in holes in required data |
tasks often not completed correctly
data often missing, illegible and/or incorrect, pattern of not following protocols / directions |
|
INFORMATION IN FIELD MANUAL |
all topics addressed, information is insightful
clearly relates to main topic and field work
several supporting details and/or examples
strong, compelling support
accurate, add to reader's grasp of topic |
questions answered with adequate sentence or two
information clearly relates to main topic and field work
occasional supporting details and/or examples
strong support
accurate |
one or more topics not addressed in any way
information clearly relates to main topic and field work
no supporting details and/or examples
provides adequate support
usually accurate |
several topics not addressed in any way
information has little or nothing to do with main topic and field work
no supporting details and/or examples
insufficient support
usually not accurate |
|
MECHANICS |
spelling and grammar correct |
spelling and grammar generally correct (half dozen errors or less) |
errors in spelling and grammar (half dozen to dozen errors) |
distracting number of errors in spelling and grammar |
|
FINISHED MANUAL |
organized, easy to read
eye-catching, creates interest
demonstrates ample evidence of research |
readable
details are brief or obvious
demonstrates evidence of research |
somewhat unorganized
colorless, bland, hard to read
sketchy information that may be list-like with little evidence of research |
unorganized, difficult to read
sloppy
no evidence of research |
|
RUBRIC TOTAL (20 points max) |
| ||||
LATE POINTS DEDUCTED (1 PER DAY LATE) |
| ||||
TOTAL POINTS |
|
Remember that this is a 20-point assignment ... the detail and comprehensiveness of your response should reflect that additional weight. It's also your last opportunity to show me how much you've learned in the course.
|